Mass

The mean spirited attempt to expunge the names of Boston City Council President James M. Kelly and City Councilor Albert L. “Dapper” O’Neil from public spaces in Boston

 

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
December 7, 2022

Letters to the Editor
The Boston Globe
One Exchange Place, Suite 201
Boston, MA 02109-2132
letter@globe.com

To the Editor:
The mean spirited attempt to expunge the names of Boston City Council President James M. Kelly and City Councilor Albert L. “Dapper” O’Neil from public spaces in Boston is a vindictive campaign of damnatio memoriae, (You’ve heard about efforts to rename Faneuil Hall. But what about spaces named after these modern-day figures?, 12/2/2022).

Unlike many modern politicians, Kelly and O’Neill actually sought to represent the views and values of those who elected them. Neither of them got rich in public office, and neither of them retired to become corporate lobbyists.

O’Neil’s longevity in elected office was attributed to his willingness to provide constituent services to all the neighborhoods of Boston.

Kelly and O’Neil were right to oppose forced busing for the public schools in 1974. So did most Bostonians.

Federal Judge Arthur Garrity’s order to abolish neighborhood schools and bus school children to implement desegregation was opposed by a margin of 15 to 1 in a non-binding municipal referendum held in May of 1974.

An April, 1974 Boston Globe poll found that 63% of city residents were against the busing of school children out of their own neighborhoods.

subsequent Globe poll found that less than half of black parents supported court ordered busing, while nearly 80% favored a freedom of choice plan for the public schools.

Sincerely,

C. J. Doyle
Executive Director
Catholic Action League of Massachusetts
PO Box 112,
Boston, MA 02131

One Reply to “The mean spirited attempt to expunge the names of Boston City Council President James M. Kelly and City Councilor Albert L. “Dapper” O’Neil from public spaces in Boston

  1. Mayor Wu, Healey, Ed Flynn etc.all rushed to honor and curtsy for the British royal couple a couple of weeks back. They seek to remove from history those from the past that they disagree with, like O’Neill and Kelly. However, no problem in honoring and fawning over symbols of the British Crown. In the name of that institution, nations were conquered. People were divided by race, religion and class. Even slavery. From Ireland to India. Yet the self proclaimed “progressives” ignore those facts and yet hold others to scrutiny. Hypocrites.

Leave a Reply to Moderate Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *